BOQ - Kitap Yönetim Sistemi
Kitap Bölümü

DÖRTLÜ BİLGİ MODELİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN KESİR ÖĞRETİMİ: KAVRAMSAL VE İŞLEMSEL BİLGİNİN BÜTÜNLEŞTİRİLMESİ

Berna Cantürk Günhan
Prof. Dr., Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi
Erişim Durumu
Özel Erişim
Yayınlanma Tarihi
Sayfa Sayısı
-
DOI

Özet

Kesirler, öğrencilerin doğal sayılara ilişkin bilgilerini yeniden gözden geçirmelerini gerektirir. Bu süreçte öğretmenin hangi temsili seçtiği, örnekleri nasıl sıraladığı ve öğrencinin beklenmedik yanıtına nasıl karşılık verdiği önem kazanır. Bu kuramsal derlemede Dörtlü Bilgi Modeli’nin temel, dönüşüm, bağlantı ve beklenmedik durum boyutları kesir öğretimi açısından ele alınmaktadır. Önce modelin öğretmen bilgisi araştırmalarındaki yeri ve kesir öğretimine ilişkin yaklaşımlar incelenmekte; ardından iki alanyazın, kavramsal ve işlemsel bilginin ilişkisi üzerinden birlikte okunmaktadır. Kesir denkliği için önerilen bir ders dizisi, öğretmenin kararları ile öğrencinin anlam kurma fırsatlarını somutlaştırmak amacıyla dört boyutta çözümlenmektedir. Bölüm, bu çözümlemenin öğretmen eğitimi ve süreç odaklı değerlendirme için sunduğu olanakları ve gerçek sınıf verisiyle sınanması gereken yönlerini tartışmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Dörtlü Bilgi Modeli, öğretmen bilgisi, kesir öğretimi, kavramsal bilgi, işlemsel bilgi

Konu Alanı: Sosyal Bilimler -> Eğitim -> Eğitim ve Eğitim Araştırmaları

Bu Bölüme Atıf Yap
Dinçer Aksoy, B. & Cantürk Günhan, B. (2026). DÖRTLÜ BİLGİ MODELİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN KESİR ÖĞRETİMİ: KAVRAMSAL VE İŞLEMSEL BİLGİNİN BÜTÜNLEŞTİRİLMESİ. In ÇİFÇİ, M. (Ed.), Eğitim Bilimleri: Kuramdan Uygulamaya Araştırmadan Geleceğe (pp. -). Vizetek Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.54637/vizetek.9786253824310

Abrahamson, D. (2009). Embodied design: Constructing means for constructing meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9137-1

Abrahamson, D. (2014). Building educational activities for understanding: An elaboration on the embodied-design framework and its epistemic grounds. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.07.002

Abrahamson, D., & Bakker, A. (2016). Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1, Article 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0034-3

Abrahamson, D., & Trninic, D. (2015). Bringing forth mathematical concepts: Signifying sensorimotor enactment in fields of promoted action. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0620-0

Abrahamson, D., Trninic, D., Gutiérrez, J. F., Huth, J., & Lee, R. G. (2011). Hooks and shifts: A dialectical study of mediated discovery. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16(1), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-011-9177-y

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034952

Behr, M. J., Lesh, R., Post, T. R., & Silver, E. A. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 91–126). Academic Press.

Birgin, O., & Gürbüz, R. (2009). İlköğretim II. kademe öğrencilerinin rasyonel sayılar konusundaki işlemsel ve kavramsal bilgi düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 529–550.

Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z

Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Reidel.

Hallett, D., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge when learning fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017486

Haser, Ç., & Ubuz, B. (2002). Kesirlerde kavramsal ve işlemsel performans. Eğitim ve Bilim, 27(126), 53–61.

Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Howison, M., Trninic, D., Reinholz, D., & Abrahamson, D. (2011). The Mathematical Imagery Trainer: From embodied interaction to conceptual learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1989–1998). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979230

Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive, and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. A. Lesh (Ed.), Number and measurement: Papers from a research workshop (pp. 101–144). ERIC/SMEAC.

Knowledge Quartet. (t.y.). Fractions [Kodlama kılavuzu senaryoları]. Erişim adresi: http://www.knowledgequartet.org/tag/fractions/

Lamon, S. J. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803165

Lortie-Forgues, H., Tian, J., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Why is learning fraction and decimal arithmetic so difficult? Developmental Review, 38, 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.008

Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/749454

Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2024a). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli: İlkokul matematik dersi öğretim programı (1, 2, 3 ve 4. sınıflar). https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/upload/program/2024programmat1234Onayli.pdf

Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2024b). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli: Ortaokul matematik dersi öğretim programı (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar). https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/upload/program/2024programmat5678Onayli.pdf

Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3

Pesen, C. (2007). Öğrencilerin kesirlerle ilgili kavram yanılgıları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 32(143), 79–88.

Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x

Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346

Rowland, T. (2013). The Knowledge Quartet: The genesis and application of a framework for analysing mathematics teaching and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. Sisyphus – Journal of Education, 1(3), 15–43. https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.3705

Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The Knowledge Quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5

Rowland, T., Martyn, S., Barber, P., & Heal, C. (2000). Primary teacher trainees’ mathematics subject knowledge and classroom performance. Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 3–18.

Rowland, T., Thwaites, A., & Jared, L. (2011). Triggers of contingency in mathematics teaching. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 73–80). PME.

Rowland, T., Turner, F., Thwaites, A., & Huckstep, P. (2009). Developing primary mathematics teaching: Reflecting on practice with the Knowledge Quartet. SAGE.

Ruthven, K. (2011). Conceptualising mathematical knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 83–96). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_6

Schneider, M., & Stern, E. (2010). The developmental relations between conceptual and procedural knowledge: A multimethod approach. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016701

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., Susperreguy, M. I., & Chen, M. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101

Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62(4), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001

Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.

Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034943

Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2010). Children’s fractional knowledge. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0591-8

Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm of developmental research. Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3168-1

Turner, F. (2012). Using the Knowledge Quartet to develop mathematics content knowledge: The role of reflection on professional development. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.734972

Turner, F., & Rowland, T. (2011). The Knowledge Quartet as an organising framework for developing and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 195–212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_12

Weston, T. L., Kleve, B., & Rowland, T. (2013). Developing an online coding manual for the Knowledge Quartet: An international project. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 32(3), 179–184.

Yağlı, G. (2025). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının Dörtlü Bilgi Modeli’ne dayalı ders planlama becerilerinin incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi].

Kitap Bölümü (PDF)
DÖRTLÜ BİLGİ MODELİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN KESİR ÖĞRETİMİ: KAVRAMSAL VE İŞLEMSEL BİLGİNİN BÜTÜNLEŞTİRİLMESİ
Bu Bölüme Atıf Yap:
Dinçer Aksoy, B. & Cantürk Günhan, B. (2026). DÖRTLÜ BİLGİ MODELİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN KESİR ÖĞRETİMİ: KAVRAMSAL VE İŞLEMSEL BİLGİNİN BÜTÜNLEŞTİRİLMESİ. In ÇİFÇİ, M. (Ed.), Eğitim Bilimleri: Kuramdan Uygulamaya Araştırmadan Geleceğe (pp. -). Vizetek Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.54637/vizetek.9786253824310
Kitap:
Yayınevi:
Vizetek Yayıncılık