ECOLOGIES OF BLACK WOMANHOOD: A COMPARATIVE ECOFEMINIST READING OF TONI MORRISON'S TAR BABY AND ALICE WALKER'S THE COLOR PURPLE
Özet
The purpose of this chapter is to investigate the interrelated dynamics of patriarchal oppression, the racial marginalization of women, and the exploitation of the nonhuman world, using an ecofeminist comparative approach to analyze Toni Morrison’s Tar Baby (1981) and Alice Walker’s The Color Purple (1982). Many theorists and scholars have described ecofeminism as a means of identifying and analyzing the interconnected historical, material, and conceptual structures that dominate women and nature (Mies & Shiva, 2014, p. 14; Zein & Setiawan, 2017, p. 2). At the beginning stages of ecofeminism, Western capitalist patriarchy was supported by an array of dualistic thinking, culture, nature, mind, body, subject and object, to substantiate that all subjugation should apply to both human and nonhuman bodies (Avcil, 2021, p. 941; Merchant, 2005, p. 194). The traditional ecofeminist models have been criticized for their failure to adequately represent the intersectionality unique to Black women who have experienced both gender and ecological oppression as a result of slavery, colonization, and ongoing racial discrimination (Power, 2020, p. 73). Therefore, an ecofeminist analysis must involve multiple species as well as multiple forms of oppression to provide a thorough explanation of how African American women interact with their social and physical environments. The central research question in this study concerns Morrison and Walker's portrayals of the relationship between the natural environment and their Black female protagonists. It seeks to answer the question, "How do Toni Morrison's Tar Baby and Alice Walker's The Color Purple use the non-human world and ecological relationships to express postcolonial resistance, spiritual healing, and self-actualization in the face of intersectional oppression towards women?
Both novels contribute distinct and overarching ecocritical concepts of Black womanhood. Tar Baby removes Morrison from anthropocentric stories and gives the environment the status of a postcolonial protest entity (Wardi, 2011, p. 1). The environment and animals at Isle des Chevaliers, Avenue des Fleurs represent a political, activist realm and bear witness to the suffering colonialism inflicted on the land and animals (Morrison, 2004, p. 9). Finally, Morrison uses Jadine's cultural disconnect from her roots, as well as the colonial division of both land and people, to demonstrate the parallel between them (Al-Halbosy, 2019, p. 145). In contrast, in The Color Purple, Alice Walker provides an eco-feminist perspective toward the natural world and incorporates concepts of spiritual healing and reciprocal responsibility. The transformation of Celie from a person abused without a voice into an empowered agent is profoundly tied to her change in perception of God, whom she now sees as present in the natural world (p. 135). Literary ecofeminism therefore provides a transformative place through which both the healing of one's own self and the healing of the earth can occur together. This chapter uses comparative analysis to demonstrate that both Morrison and Walker have dismantled patriarchal, anthropocentric structures and offered insight into Black women's ability to act for themselves within their relationship with the more-than-human world.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Ecofeminism, African American Literature, Black Feminism, Environmental Humanities, Ecocriticism
Konu Alanı: Sosyal Bilimler -> Dilbilim ve Dil -> Dünya Dilleri ve Edebiyatları
Agarwal, A., & Mishra, P. (2025). From forests to futures: Ecofeminist visions in the fiction of Sarah Joseph, Diane Cook, and Richard Powers. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Translation Studies, 12(2), 29–37.
Al-Halbosy, A. M. K. (2019). Folklore as a means to sustain African American identity: A study of selected novels by Toni Morrison and Alice Walker (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bangor University School of English Literature.
Avcil, C. (2021). Ekofeminizmin düşünsel temelleri üzerine bir değerlendirme. In N. P. Öztürk & H. Bingöl (Eds.), 2nd International World Women Conference Full Texts Book (pp. 936–946). ISPEC Publications.
Carroll, V. P. (2018). Introduction: Ecofeminist dialogues. In D. A. Vakoch & S. Mickey (Eds.), Ecofeminism in dialogue (pp. 1–10). Lexington Books.
Eaton, H., & Lorentzen, L. A. (Eds.). (2003). Ecofeminism and globalization: Exploring culture, context, and religion. Rowman & Littlefield.
Gaard, G. (Ed.). (1993). Ecofeminism: Women, animals, nature. Temple University Press.
Gaard, G. (2017). Critical ecofeminism. Lexington Books.
James, J. C. (2026). Captive ecologies: The environmental afterlives of slavery. Duke University Press.
Kings, A. E. (2017). Intersectionality and the changing face of ecofeminism. Ethics & the Environment, 22(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.22.1.04
Lestari, M., & Farida, H. (2025). An ecofeminist analysis of Axie Oh's The Girl Who Fell Beneath the Sea. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Sastra, 11(4).
Merchant, C. (2005). Radical ecology: The search for a livable world. Routledge.
Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (2014). Ecofeminism. Zed Books.
Morrison, T. (2004). Tar Baby. Vintage International.
Murphy, P. D. (2023). Ecofeminism and literature. In D. A. Vakoch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Ecofeminism and Literature (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
Nhanenge, J. (2011). Ecofeminism: Towards integrating the concerns of women, poor people, and nature into development. University Press of America.
Plumwood, V. (1997). Androcentrism and anthropocentrism: Parallels and politics. In K. J. Warren (Ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, culture, nature (pp. 327–355). Indiana University Press.
Power, C. (2020). Multispecies ecofeminism: Ecofeminist flourishing of the twenty-first century (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Victoria.
Vakoch, D. A. (Ed.). (2023). The Routledge Handbook of Ecofeminism and Literature. Routledge.
Vakoch, D. A., & Mickey, S. (Eds.). (2018). Literature and ecofeminism: Intersectional and international voices. Routledge.
Walker, A. (1982). The Color Purple. Pocket Books.
Wardi, A. (2011). "Loud with the presence of plants and field life": The ecology of resistance in Toni Morrison's Tar Baby. Journal of Ecocriticism, 3(1), 1–16.
Warren, K. J. (1990). The power and promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 125–146.
Warren, K. J. (Ed.). (1997). Ecofeminism: Women, culture, nature. Indiana University Press.
Warren, K. J. (2000). Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Zein, L. F., & Setiawan, A. R. (2017). General overview of ecofeminism. Laxars, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fmjgk
Koroncu Özbilen, D. & Sertel, Y. G. (2026). ECOLOGIES OF BLACK WOMANHOOD: A COMPARATIVE ECOFEMINIST READING OF TONI MORRISON'S <em>TAR BABY</em> AND ALICE WALKER'S <em>THE COLOR PURPLE</em>. In TÜFEKÇİ CAN, D. (Ed.), World Literatures: Literary Concepts and Critical Contexts (pp. -). Vizetek Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.54637/vizetek.9786253823696
| Kitap: |
| Yayınevi:
Vizetek Yayıncılık |