Bilimsel Yayın Türlerine Ulaşma Yolları

Aktürk, C., & Yıldız, S. (2019). YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi’nde büyük veri alanında kayıtlı bulunan lisansüstü tezlerinin analizi. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, 41, 225-240.

American Economic Association. (2026). EconLit. American Economic Association. https://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

American Mathematical Society. (2026). MathSciNet. American Mathematical Society. https://www.ams.org/mathscinet/

American Psychological Association. (2026). APA PsycInfo. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo

ANKOS. (2026). Anadolu Üniversite Kütüphaneleri Konsorsiyumu. https://ankos.org.tr/

arXiv. (2026). arXiv.org e-print archive. https://arxiv.org/

Association for Computing Machinery. (2026). ACM Digital Library. ACM. https://dl.acm.org/

Atıl Yörü, H. (2008). Türkiye’de yürütülen kütüphaneler arası materyal ödünç alma/verme ve belge sağlama hizmetlerine toplu bir bakış. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 22(1), 82-106.

Atıl Yörü, H. (2012). Türkiye’de kütüphanelerarası işbirliğinin kısa tarihçesi ve günümüz uygulamaları. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 26(1), 154-168.

Basak, S. K. (2014). A comparison of researcher’s reference management software: RefWorks, Mendeley, and EndNote. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 6(7), 561-568. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v6i7.517

Bielefeld University Library. (2026). BASE: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine. https://www.base-search.net/

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.

Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 531-541. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283

British Library. (2026). EThOS: E-Theses Online Service. https://www.bl.uk/collection/ethos

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Budapest Open Access Initiative. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/

Bulut, B., Çelik, S., Gürdal, G., Holt, İ., Kafalı Can, G., Madran, O., & Tonta, Y. (2020). Türkiye’de açık erişim ve açık bilim. ÜNAK2020 Akademik Yayıncılık, Açık Bilim ve Kütüphane(ci)ler Sempozyumu.

Center for Open Science. (2026). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/

Clarivate. (2026). Web of Science Core Collection. Clarivate. https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-workflow-solutions/webofscience-platform/web-of-science-core-collection/

Cochrane. (2026). MECIR standards: Searching for studies. Cochrane. https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/mecir-manual

CORE. (2026). CORE: Open access research papers. https://core.ac.uk/

DergiPark. (2026). DergiPark. TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.

Digital Science. (2026). Dimensions. Digital Science. https://www.dimensions.ai/

Directory of Open Access Books. (2026). DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books. https://www.doabooks.org/

Directory of Open Access Journals. (2026). DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals. https://doaj.org/

EBSCO. (2026). Education Source and EBSCO Open Dissertations. EBSCO. https://www.ebsco.com/

Elsevier. (2026). Scopus and ScienceDirect. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF

FIZ Karlsruhe. (2026). zbMATH Open. FIZ Karlsruhe. https://zbmath.org/

Google Scholar. (2026). Google Scholar search help. Google. https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/help.html

Gusenbauer, M. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378

Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2022). Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 127, 2683-2745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04289-7

Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0138237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237

Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage.

IEEE. (2026). IEEE Xplore. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/

Institute of Education Sciences. (2026). ERIC: Education Resources Information Center. U.S. Department of Education. https://eric.ed.gov/

International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). International Test Commission. https://www.intestcom.org/

Jha, K. N., Shankar, P. R., & Awasthi, S. (2022). Literature search: A practical guide for researchers. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(10), 5710-5717.

JSTOR. (2026). JSTOR digital library. ITHAKA. https://www.jstor.org/

Lefebvre, C., Glanville, J., Briscoe, S., Featherstone, R., Littlewood, A., Metzendorf, M. I., Noel-Storr, A., Paynter, R., Rader, T., Thomas, J., & Wieland, L. S. (2024). Technical supplement to Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies. In J. P. T. Higgins vd. (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane. https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04

Leite, D. F. B., Padilha, M. A. S., & Cecatti, J. G. (2019). Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The Literature Review Checklist. Clinics, 74, e1403. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e1403

Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2022). The literature review: Six steps to success (4th ed.). Corwin.

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05053

McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D. M., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., & Lefebvre, C. (2016). PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 75, 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

National Library of Medicine. (2026). PubMed and PubMed Central. National Institutes of Health. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

NDLTD. (2026). Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. https://ndltd.org/

OATD. (2026). Open Access Theses and Dissertations. https://oatd.org/

OpenAIRE. (2026). OpenAIRE Graph and Explore. https://explore.openaire.eu/

OpenAlex. (2026). OpenAlex: The open catalog to the global research system. https://openalex.org/

OpenDOAR. (2026). Directory of Open Access Repositories. https://opendoar.ac.uk/

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Posner, B. (2014). The view from interlibrary loan services: Catalyst for a better user experience. College & Research Libraries News. https://crln.acrl.org/

Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Orr, R. (2022). OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.01833

Priem, J., vd. (2023). CORE: A global aggregation service for open access papers. Scientific Data. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02208-w

ProQuest. (2026). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. ProQuest. https://about.proquest.com/en/products-services/pqdtglobal/

ROAR. (2026). Registry of Open Access Repositories. http://roar.eprints.org/

Salvador-Oliván, J. A., Marco-Cuenca, G., & Arquero-Avilés, R. (2019). Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(2), 210-221. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.567

Sarı, Ö., & Doğan, G. (2023). Türkiye’deki üniversitelerin açık erişim arşivleri ve politikaları. Bilgi Dünyası, 24(2), 165-194.

Scoulas, J. M., vd. (2024). Use and importance of library resources to support faculty research and productivity. College & Research Libraries. https://crl.acrl.org/

Semantic Scholar. (2026). Semantic Scholar: AI-powered research tool. Allen Institute for AI. https://www.semanticscholar.org/

Serdarasan, Ş., Yılmaz, H., Doğan, E., & Koç, B. (2021). Lojistik ve tedarik zinciri alanında TR Dizin’de indekslenen çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 68, 164-184.

Springer Nature. (2026). SpringerLink. Springer Nature. https://link.springer.com/

Suber, P. (2012). Open access. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001

Taylor & Francis. (2026). Taylor & Francis Online. Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.tandfonline.com/

Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 430-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006

TOAD. (2026). Türkiye Ölçme Araçları Dizini. https://toad.halileksi.net/

Toplu, M. (2009). Belge sağlama hizmetlerinin gelişimi ve Türkiye perspektifi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 23(1), 83-118.

TR Dizin. (2026). TR Dizin. TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM. https://trdizin.gov.tr/

Tramullas, J., Sánchez-Casabón, A. I., & Garrido-Picazo, P. (2015). Studies and analysis of reference management software: A literature review. El Profesional de la Información, 24(5), 680-688. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.sep.17

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM. (2026). DergiPark, TR Dizin, HARMAN, EKUAL ve belge sağlama hizmetleri. TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM. https://ulakbim.tubitak.gov.tr/

Tığ Demir, B., & Yılmaz, B. (2024). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim kurumlarındaki açık erişim politikalarının bilgi politikası bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Bilgi Yönetimi, 7(1), 85-109.

UCL Library Services. (2025). The DART-Europe e-theses portal has closed down. University College London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/library/dart-europe-e-theses-portal-has-closed-down

UNESCO. (2015). Introduction to open access. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231920

UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949

UNESCO. (2026). Open access. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/

Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112

Wiley. (2026). Wiley Online Library. Wiley. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

Yükseköğretim Kurulu. (2026). Ulusal Tez Merkezi. Yükseköğretim Kurulu. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

Zenodo. (2026). Zenodo. CERN. https://zenodo.org/

Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123, 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8