Bilimsel Raporlaştırmada Yaygın Hatalar, Sınırlılıklar ve Güçlükler
Özet
Bilimsel raporlaştırma süreci, lisansüstü öğrenim gören öğrencilerin ve kariyerlerinin
başlangıcında olan genç araştırmacıların en az araştırma tasarlamak, veri toplama ve analiz
süreçlerini yürütmek kadar özen göstermeleri gereken önemli bir akademik faaliyeti temsil
eder. Araştırmacıların raporlama sürecinde karşılaşabilecekleri hatalar, sınırlılık ve güçlüklere
dair farkındalık geliştirmeleri, nitelikli akademik metinler oluşturmalarını kolaylaştıracaktır.
Bu bağlamda kitabın hali hazırdaki bölümünde Bilimsel Raporlaştırmada Yaygın Hatalar,
Sınırlılıklar ve Güçlükler başlığı ele alınmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu başlık biçimsel ve dilsel
hatalar, içerik ve yöntemle ilgili hatalar, kaynak taramanın sınırlılıkları ve güçlükleri, yayın
yanlılığı, dil ve erişim sınırlılıkları ile bilgi kirliliği olmak üzere altı alt başlıkla
detaylandırılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: bilimsel raporlaştırma, raporlaştırmada hatalar
Konu Alanı: Sosyal Bilimler -> Eğitim -> Eğitim ve Eğitim Araştırmaları
Adom, D., Hussein, E. K., & Agyem, J. A. (2018). Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of a quality research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 438-441.
Altay, S. (2024). Akademi̇k yazma zanaati: Sosyoloji̇ alanı üzeri̇ne bi̇r araştırma. [Doktora tezi, Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Angelini, D. J. (2023). Delving into the critical components of the discussion section. Nurse Author & Editor, 33(3-4), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.12056
Antonenko, P. D. (2015). The instrumental value of conceptual frameworks in educational technology research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9363-4
Arenas-Castro, H., Berdejo-Espinola, V., Chowdhury, S., Rodríguez-Contreras, A., James, A. R. M., Raja, N. B., Dunne, E. M., Bertolino, S., Emidio, N. B., Derez, C. M., Drobniak, S. M., Fulton, G. R., Henao-Diaz, L. F., Kaur, A., Kim, C. J. S., Lagisz, M., Medina, I., Mikula, P., Narayan, V. P., … Amano, T. (2024). Academic publishing requires linguistically inclusive policies. Biological Science Practices, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.2840
Brown, J., & Marsden, J. (2026). Generative AI tools and fabricated references. Addiction, 121(5), 1032-1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70379
Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O., & Du Plessis, C. C. (2023). The science of literature reviews: Searching, identifying, selecting, and synthesising. Publications, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002
Crawford, J. (2025). Systematic literature reviews: Why I rejected your review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/10vb5076
Daniel, B. (2022). Common challenges postgraduate students and early-career academics face when engaging with the scholarly literature. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 20(3), 142-152. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2503
Doğan, F. Ş., Yağız, O., & Kaçar, I. G. (2018). An investigation of the citation transformation types in M.A. and PhD theses. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0032-y
Elliott, T., Fazeen, B., Asrat, A., Cetto, A. M., Eriksson, S., Looi, L. M., & Negra, D. (2022). Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers. Learned Publishing, 35(4), 516-528. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1458
Ghane, M. R. (2016). How accurate are cited references in Iranian peer-reviewed journals? Learned Publishing, 29(2), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1000
Gøtzsche, P. C. (2022). Citation bias: Questionable research practice or scientific misconduct? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 115(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768221075881
Hamed, D. M., & Alqurashi, N. (2025). Authorial voice in Q1 linguistics and hard science journals: A corpus-based comparative study of stance, engagement, and genre conventions. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2528918. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2528918
Hannah, K., Haddaway, N. R., Fuller, R. A., & Amano, T. (2024). Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: Barriers and perspectives. Research Synthesis Methods, 15(3), 466-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1699
Holmes, B., Waterbury, T., Baltrinic, E., & Davis, A. (2018). Angst about academic writing: Graduate students at the brink. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 11(2), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.19030/CIER.V11I2.10149
Hopewell, S., Loudon, K., Clarke, M. J., Oxman, A. D., & Dickersin, K. (2009). Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3
Howard, K., & Tummon, N. (2025). Understanding student citation literacy: A multi-method approach. Public Services Quarterly, 21(2), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2025.2467715
Joober, R., Schmitz, N., Annable, L., & Boksa, P. (2012). Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome? Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.120065
Karagöl, E. (2018). Akademi̇k yazma açısından li̇sansüstü tezler. [Doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Karagöl, E., Boylu, E., & Çevik, A. (2024). View of academic reading in graduate students: İnterpretative phenomenological analysis. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.37.1754
Kehinde, S. (2025). Writing a statement of research problem. SAR Journal - Science and Research, 8(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.18421/SAR81-12
Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
Logan, S. W., Hussong-Christian, U., Case, L., & Noregaard, S. (2024). Reference accuracy of primary studies about reference accuracy: A descriptive study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 57, 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231224437
Mertens, S., & Baethge, C. (2011). The Virtues of Correct Citation. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 108(33), 550-552. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2011.0550
Mitchell, A., & Rich, M. (2022). The challenges of writing an effective literature review for students and new researchers of business. 21(1), 141-148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.21.1.169
Mogull, S. A. (2017). Accuracy of cited “facts” in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184727
Monteith, S., Glenn, T., Geddes, J. R., Whybrow, P. C., Achtyes, E., & Bauer, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and increasing misinformation. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 224(2), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2023.136
Moreira, J. V., & Corrêa, M. L. G. (2024). Sobre a escrita acadêmico-científica: O ensaio da perspectiva de pós-graduandos. Redis: Revista De Estudos Do Discurso, (15), 168-201. https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red15a6
Muradchanian, J., Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2023). The role of results in deciding to publish: A direct comparison across authors, reviewers, and editors based on an online survey. Plos One, 18(10), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292279
Müngen, A. A. (2023). Exploring lexical richness in english-language theses across disciplines: A comparative analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 12(2), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.2.042
Nurjonov, A., Juraev, A., Hajiyev, E., Hudayberganov, D., Tursunova, G., Kayumova, G., & Turabekova, B. (2026). Managing Higher Education Development in Resource-Limited Academic Environments. Qubahan Academic Journal, 6(2), 588-603. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v6n2a2464
Nurkamto, J., Djatmika, D., & Prihandoko, L. A. (2022). Students’ problems of academic writing competencies, challenges in online thesis supervision, and the solutions: Thesis supervisors’ perspectives. A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 33(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v33i1/123-147
Ocholla, D. N. (2022). A research dashboard for aligning research components in research proposals, theses, and dissertations in library and information science. In P. Ngulube (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mixed Methods Research in Information Science (pp. 629-640). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8844-4.ch029
Pavlovic, V., Weissgerber, T., Stanisavljevic, D., Pekmezovic, T., Garovic, V., Milićević, O., Lazović, J. M., Cirkovic, A., Savić, M., Rajović, N., Piperac, P., Djuric, N., Madžarević, P., Dimitrijevic, A., Randjelovic, S., Nestorović, E., Akinyombo, R., Pavlović, A., Ghamrawi, R., … Milić, N. (1979). How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature? Clin Sci, 12(135), 671-681. doi: 10.1042/CS20201573.
Perera, H. S. (2025). Questioning the predator of the predatory journals: How fair are global publishing standards? Learned Publishing, 38(2), e1662. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1662
Rajaratnam, V., Omar, U. F., Kee, K., & Kaliya-Perumal, A. K. (2026). Citation inaccuracies and the need for multi-level oversight in AI-assisted medical writing. Standards, 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/standards6010010
Resnik, D. B., & Hosseini, M. (2026). Hallucinated citations produced by generative artificial intelligence may constitute research misconduct when citations function as data in scholarly papers. Accountability in Research, 0(0), 2645390. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2026.2645390
Schiekiera, L., Eichel, K., Heßelmann, F., Sachse, J., Müller, S. P., & Niemeyer, H. (2025). Publication bias in academic decision-making in clinical psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 8(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251372134
Shah, S. R. A. (2025). Research methods, methodologies, and paradigms: A practical guide to research design for postgraduate students. Journal of Social Sciences Research & Policy, 3(3), 388. https://doi.org/10.71327/jssrp.33.388.406
Shrestha, J. (2021). Predatory journals as threats to the academic publishing: A review. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v4i2.33640
Sianipar, R. L., Siagian, S. P., Situmorang, S. B., Nainggolan, J., Siringoringo, E., & Siregar, M. W. (2025). Analisis kesalahan berbahasa dalam artikel yang berjudul “meningkatkan budaya literasi membaca dan menulis siswa melalui pembiasaan di kelas”. Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan, 3(2), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.61132/pragmatik.v3i2.1547
Snyder, H. (2024). Designing the literature review for a strong contribution. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 551-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197704
Sodangi, U., & İsmail, A. (2025). Responsible integration of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing: A narrative review and synthesis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Neural Network, 5(2), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.55529/jaimlnn.52.13.23
Soman, C. (2024). Impact of predatory publishing and Strategies for publication in a good journal. Annals of Abbasi Shaheed Hospital and Karachi Medical & Dental College, 29(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.58397/ashkmdc.v29i2.755
Spennemann, D. H. (2026). How unique are hallucinated citations offered by generative Artificial Intelligence models? https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.16407
Sreehari, P., Sheshadri, K. N., & Vijayakumar, S. (2025). An evaluation of APA citation and referencing accuracy in library and information science doctoral theses. International Journal of Research in Library Science, 11(2), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.26761/ijrls.11.2.2025.1868
Steigerwald, E., Ramírez-Castañeda, V., Brandt, D. Y. C., Báldi, A., Shapiro, J. T., Bowker, L., & Tarvin, R. D. (2022). Overcoming language barriers in academia: Machine translation tools and a vision for a multilingual future. BioScience, 72(10), 988-998. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac062
Suleimanova, O. A., & Lykova, T. A. (2023). Academic writing details in critical perspective. Training, Language and Culture, 7(3), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-3-94-102
Sweetland, J. H. (1989). Errors in bibliographic citations: A continuing problem. The Library Quarterly. 59(4), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1086/602160
Walter, L., & Stouck, J. (2020). Writing the literature review: Graduate student experiences. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.1.8295
Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5
Willie, M. M. (2025). Rethinking literature reviews: Key pitfalls and strategies for postgraduates. Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research, 3(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.53866/ijcar.v3i2.883
Zhang, M., Doi, L., Awua, J., Asare, H., & Stenhouse, R. (2023). Challenges and possible solutions for accessing scholarly literature among medical and nursing professionals and students in low-and-middle income countries: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 123, 105737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105737